| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Gaditus
Joined: 05 Feb 07
Posts: 1924
Location: Canterbury, UK
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 5:34 am Post subject: Amun Re Tournaments Finals |
 |
|
In each tournament the 3/4/5 finalists will be the leading 3/4/5 from the individual games.
I had envisaged the finals to be one 3/4/5 player game, but they could be best of 3 (say), with the same tie breakers in force.
Unless there is a massive outcry I will go for just one game, but if you want to be part of that outcry, reply here! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rebelslayer
Joined: 17 Jan 06
Posts: 298
Location: Adelaide, Australia
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 6:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
3 sounds better to me!
Judging by my current form I wont be one of them.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Payton3434
Joined: 28 Dec 06
Posts: 690
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 7:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I think for the finals best of 3 is a better way to go |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
swok
Joined: 03 Oct 06
Posts: 96
Location: amsterdam
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 4:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Na, 3games 3 winners, going back to points, to gold.......................
Better one good game, and may the luckyist winn!!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
efreeman
Joined: 11 Aug 04
Posts: 36
Location: Philadelphia suburbs, PA
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 5:51 pm Post subject: Amun Re tournament finals |
|
|
I think a best of 3 sounds good, but simultaneous, to reduce any chance for "meta-gaming" during any individual games. (i.e. how one plays is influenced by how the previous games went.)
Eric |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
freduk
Joined: 18 Jan 06
Posts: 433
Location: Bristol, UK
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2007 7:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I'm in the "one game, one winner" camp. Over 3 games it's harder to work out who actually "won". |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Your Games
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
