| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Gaditus
Joined: 05 Feb 07
Posts: 1924
Location: Canterbury, UK
|
 Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 5:42 am Post subject: Every Loser Wins - standings |
 |
|
6/16 (inc 01 and 16 where the results are known)
4 3 0 1 Gaditus (6)
1 1 0 0 kwojtasz (0)
2 1 1 0 rseulow (4)
3 1 2 0 NoMoreCheese (0)
1 0 1 0 DariusvanDuyn (10)
1 0 0 1 StanislavTikal (5)
1 0 0 1 Payton3434 (6)
1 0 0 1 Big (15)
1 0 0 1 AdriaanPieters (18)
1 0 0 1 amoxycillin (23)
2 0 2 0 kekeweb (10)
0 0 0 0 Pompkin (0)
If something lo0ks odd with NoMoreCheese's points 'won' by it down to 2 losses on the tie breaker (number of stones).
I have to say that I am enjoying this variant immensely. I intend to run another one when this reaches the final - perhaps 4 player. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Big
Joined: 23 Dec 07
Posts: 29
Location: Fullerton, CA
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry if this seems like a stupid question  I haven't played in a lot of tournaments.
What do the #'s mean?
Examples: 1 0 0 1 Big (15) or 2 1 1 0 rseulow (4) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Knave
Joined: 28 Jun 08
Posts: 258
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Are we going to finish the original "every loser wins" practice tourney when cps finally completes the game? Or has this new tourney superceded the old one?
Realistically, cps has slowed down again (and is looking to join more hacienda tourneys  ) so we may not be done for a while yet... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jglazier
Joined: 22 Nov 05
Posts: 119
Location: Brentwood, CA
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| cps95 has been on "vacation" for a few days, so you have to give him some slack for that. However, this time I agree with you that he is really slowing down many games. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gaditus
Joined: 05 Feb 07
Posts: 1924
Location: Canterbury, UK
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 2:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Big wrote: | Sorry if this seems like a stupid question I haven't played in a lot of tournaments.
What do the #'s mean?
Examples: 1 0 0 1 Big (15) or 2 1 1 0 rseulow (4) |
In tourneys where the aim is to win it would mean Big played 1, 1st 0, 2nd 0, 3rd 1, lost by 15 points.
In this one it is the same but with 1st meaning last etc. The lost by points are won by.
I hope that makes sense! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gaditus
Joined: 05 Feb 07
Posts: 1924
Location: Canterbury, UK
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 2:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Knave wrote: | Are we going to finish the original "every loser wins" practice tourney when cps finally completes the game? Or has this new tourney superceded the old one?
Realistically, cps has slowed down again (and is looking to join more hacienda tourneys ) so we may not be done for a while yet... |
I guess we will see whether the finalists in the first tourney want to play the final when it gets to that stage. I for one am happy to continue with it.
I am not sure there is any point in any further cps bashing - both Kanga and I are aware of the time he has taken in our various tournaments and will take that into account as and when he wishes to join future tournaments.
You will note that I have put a specific six week deadline on the Amun Re league - we will see how this works in practice. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Big
Joined: 23 Dec 07
Posts: 29
Location: Fullerton, CA
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 12:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Gaditus wrote: |
In tourneys where the aim is to win it would mean Big played 1, 1st 0, 2nd 0, 3rd 1, lost by 15 points.
I hope that makes sense! |
Ahhh! Thank you. That makes perfect sense!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gaditus
Joined: 05 Feb 07
Posts: 1924
Location: Canterbury, UK
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2008 2:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
11/16
4 3 0 1 Gaditus (6)
2 2 0 0 Pompkin (0)
3 2 1 0 rseulow (4)
4 2 2 0 kwojtasz (14)
2 1 0 1 StanislavTikal (5)
3 1 2 0 NoMoreCheese (0)
1 0 0 1 Big (15)
2 0 1 1 DariusvanDuyn (23)
3 0 3 0 kekeweb (18)
3 0 1 2 Payton3434 (13)
3 0 1 2 amoxycillin (46)
3 0 0 3 AdriaanPieters (54)
Given that there will be 4 in the final, I think I have qualified. Still seven players in with a chance for the other 3 spots.
If you think you have what it takes to finish last then you can sign up for the next tournament here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gaditus
Joined: 05 Feb 07
Posts: 1924
Location: Canterbury, UK
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 4:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
14/16
4 3 0 1 Gaditus (6)
3 2 0 1 StanislavTikal (5)
4 2 2 0 Pompkin (6)
4 2 2 0 rseulow (7)
4 2 2 0 kwojtasz (14)
3 1 1 1 DariusvanDuyn (23)
3 1 0 2 Big (18)
4 1 2 1 NoMoreCheese (7)
3 0 3 0 kekeweb (18)
3 0 1 2 Payton3434 (13)
3 0 0 3 AdriaanPieters (54)
4 0 1 3 amoxycillin (61)
Two games to go. StanislavTikal needs to lose/win to take the last spot in the final from kwojtasz. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gaditus
Joined: 05 Feb 07
Posts: 1924
Location: Canterbury, UK
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 5:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
16/16
4 3 0 1 Gaditus (6)
4 2 2 0 Pompkin (6)
4 2 2 0 rseulow (7)
4 2 2 0 kwojtasz (14)
4 2 1 1 StanislavTikal (7)
4 2 1 1 DariusvanDuyn (23)
4 1 3 0 kekeweb (18)
4 1 2 1 NoMoreCheese (7)
4 1 0 3 Big (27)
4 0 2 2 Payton3434 (16)
4 0 1 3 amoxycillin (61)
4 0 0 4 AdriaanPieters (67)
zzz Every Loser Wins Final - password final
I'll set the final up tomorrow, unless someone else wants to do it beforehand. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kwojtasz
Joined: 15 Nov 05
Posts: 54
Location: buffalo, ny
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 8:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I setup it up for you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gaditus
Joined: 05 Feb 07
Posts: 1924
Location: Canterbury, UK
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
and the winner (loser) is ...
... kwojtasz
well played (again) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Your Games
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
